NVR Logo
The right to say no to new taxes
Friday, July 04, 2008
Save and Share Share
Dear editor, Napa County residents are facing a sales tax increase to 8.25 percent in the November election. The transportation authority, with the full approval of each city council and the county supervisors, wants a new transportation tax. They want more taxes just when hard-pressed taxpayers, homeowners and families are facing an unemployment rate of almost 7 percent in California, gas prices approaching $4.75 a gallon, food costs escalating, sewer fees increasing, rising garbage fees, rising water rates and families losing their homes due to mortgage fraud.

Fortunately we have the right to vote on this tax increase!
Since last year the transportation bureaucrats have been amassing a campaign war chest of hundreds of thousands of dollars from donations from every possible out-of-area group hoping to profit from this tax. And, like in 2006, I am sure they will spend taxpayer funds to send mailers to “educate” us. If their tax is such a good idea, why do they need to sell it to us?

Fortunately we have the right to vote on this tax increase!
Our transportation bureaucrats plan to tell us that we need to be a “self-help” county to get state and federal funding. But, they won’t tell you that after Measure H was defeated, the state and Caltrans came in and virtually took over and paid for all the local major road projects at state expense.

Fortunately we have the right to vote on this tax increase!
Napa County voters defeated Measure H in 2006, which was a half-cent sales tax increase, and defeated the wasteful Napa Valley College bond last February. The anti-tax sentiment in Napa County is energized because people have learned that it is OK to vote no on new taxes and have defeated two of them. Solano County voters have shown us that it is OK to vote no on new taxes because they have defeated a transportation tax increase four times in a row.

Fortunately we have the right to vote on this tax increase!

A large nucleus of people is growing in each city and area of Napa County to fight this new tax. Groups in each town are organizing meetings soon to speak out, put up signs and give out factual information to help defeat this tax increase. Defeating Measure H and Measure L has saved every family in this county hundreds of dollars a year. If you are thankful, please get involved and help us do it again. E-mail us at nonewtax@yahoo.com or write to P.O. Box 2309, Napa.

Fortunately we have the right to vote on this tax increase!

Leon Brauning / Napa
17 comment(s)

glenroy wrote on Jul 4, 2008 8:42 AM:

" Leon….many of us commend you for all that you have done attempting to bring some sense of fiscal sanity to these bottomless money pits. "

jasper wrote on Jul 4, 2008 8:57 AM:

" Thanks for Leon Brauning's leadership against this tax. The one thing he does not mention is that the politicians will float a bond issue to start the down-Valley projects. The huge interest cost will kick the cost of those projects up 300%. "

kevin wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:27 AM:

" What a great letter for the 4th of July! A perfect time for taxpayers to reflect on the bumbling bureaucracy's constant need to tax, tax again, tax more. Voters should not support this tax increase if for no other reason than it was already voted down once before. What part of "no" don't they understand?

Reminds one of those telemarketers who just won't stop calling... "

freeport56 wrote on Jul 4, 2008 11:16 AM:

" It is the Democratic way to raise taxes and fees during time of economic crisis. They are economically impaired. Noreen Evans' propoganda piece jut hit our mail boxes. She claims 70% of her district is for raising corporate taxes. I guess they are unaware of who pays those taxes.

Leon Brauning is the right man at the right time to fight these insane decisions. "

Dwayne wrote on Jul 4, 2008 11:16 AM:

" This is getting old, but we ain't seen nuthin' yet, if Obama and his tax and spend minions sweep the Congress and take the White House. "

JimClark wrote on Jul 4, 2008 11:58 AM:

" Taxation with representation is worse than taxation without representation. Why? The People elect the representatives. Don't vote for them or recall them when they violate their trust. "

russ wrote on Jul 4, 2008 4:14 PM:

" Increase sales tax? No way, no how, no more, NEVER.

Grow the economy, not the tax burden. Defeat the liberals. "

Dwayne wrote on Jul 4, 2008 4:20 PM:

" Well, nobody's gonna have any disposable income after the democraps get through with us, and the third world society has already infiltrated our society, so just be happy with what you all have allowed to happen. I have a years supply of food and guns, and am beginning to think that's not going to be enough..... "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Jul 4, 2008 5:32 PM:

" "Borrow and Spend" GOPers who criticize what future Democratic Party politicians might do if/when they are elected apparently have no shame. During Bush's two terms, GOPers in Washington, D.C. have supported the largest expansion of the Federal govenment since the end of World War II. At the same time, they have also sponsored legislation to increase spending on a wide variety of discretionary projects. President Bush and his supporters love to spend tax dollars. GOP pots too often shrilly point fingers at Democratic Party kettles. What amazing hypocrites! "

msetty wrote on Jul 4, 2008 8:05 PM:

" The increasingly bad state of local roads is due to two factors: (1) the fact that if gasoline taxes had been indexed for inflation since the 1970's, the buying power of the resulting revenues would have been more than sufficient to keep our roads in A-1 condition. (2) When the Govenator cut the so-called "car tax" in 2003, virtually all of that money was received by cities and counties, and was mostly spent on local streets and road maintenance. We now see the results of cutting off this funding.

I agree that sales taxes are a bad way to fund roads, given the disconnect between who pays and who benefits, e.g., a large percentage of people who drive relatively little will pay more than their share of the sales tax for roads. A better solution is to get rid of the gas tax and institute a per mile charge for roads, split between the state and local government, adjusted to some degree by vehicle weight.

This is most certainly the fairest way to collect these essential revenues, since the tax would be directly related to the miles one drove. Such a measure will ultimately be needed anyway if there is a large shift to "pluggable hybrids," e.g., cars powered mainly from electricity that would consume considerably less than half the current amount of gasoline. "

Hear Ye wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:04 PM:

" Madison Jay-


You just have to get used to it. It's the same righties who constantly write comments about ANYTHING and use it as an excuse to rip the Democratic party. Sometimes I think they have some sort of auto-response system they use. "

msetty wrote on Jul 5, 2008 2:30 AM:

" Hear Ye & Madison Jay:

The knee-jerk anti-tax types that always pop up on these comment threads and elsewhere can best be characterized as "something for nothing conservatives."

Of course, in the real world, you never get "something for nothing." If you pay nothing, you get nothing.

It is clear that more funding is needed for road maintenance in this county, particularly in light of the fact that asphalt and concrete costs have gone up 70%+ since the turn of the century, a fact I neglected in my last post here.

But don't expect to get "something for nothing!" This is why I suggest some reasonable increases in "user fees" such as vehicle licenses are inevitable at some point--unless you want to see city streets and county roads gradually revert to dirt and gravel. "

ADark1 wrote on Jul 5, 2008 9:48 AM:

" Actually, In My part of Napa, (south) Streets and sidewalks are pretty much there already...Guess I better go trim my weeds! "

kevin wrote on Jul 5, 2008 11:09 AM:

" That is a very good point msetty; we need more gravel roads. It's insane to try to pave every road in the county. We can't afford the maintenance. Knoxville road is a prime example. It should be a good gravel road, easy and cheap to maintain. "

a teacher wrote on Jul 5, 2008 6:00 PM:

" "I agree that sales taxes are a bad way to fund roads, given the disconnect between who pays and who benefits, e.g., a large percentage of people who drive relatively little will pay more than their share of the sales tax for roads."

Everyone benefits from good roads, unless you know a way that food gets to your local supermarket shelve or the people that make to USA work get to their jobs. You don't have to litterally drive them to benefit from them. "

msetty wrote on Jul 5, 2008 11:30 PM:

" 'Everyone benefits from good roads...'

Well, yes, as such I agree, more or less. But one of the reasons that Western Europeans use only 1/3 as much gasoline per capita as U.S. residents is because, for decades, they've had taxes on gasoline that are an order of magnitude higher than here.

Historically, Europe never had much oil compared to the U.S., but ironically they are in much better energy shape. European roads are also in much better shape than here, which facilitates the much higher percentage of truck traffic (and relatively short distances where freight rail isn't competitive).

When a particular activity--driving--is subsidized in a manner disconnected to that activity, the result is more of it than is either economically or environmentally optimum. This also causes excessive pollution and congestion, a much higher percentage of incomes spent on transportation compared to other Western societies, sprawl, and a whole host of other problems.

In this country, very early on, local government also began to require all development to include massive off-street parking. Something like 99% of all auto trips have "free" parking, despite the fact that these private sector expenses add $2,000+ per year per vehicle to economic costs, expenses that are rarely assessed to the act of driving itself. There are other things such as medical and death costs not covered by auto insurance, but there isn't space here to go into more detail. "

plasticpinkflamingo wrote on Jul 6, 2008 1:05 AM:

" Katrina came along and huge amounts of $$$ had to be spent (much of it wasted) and the Dems complained it wasn't enough.

But yes, the Repubs have just as much dirt on their hands, for losing their compass and becoming Dem wannabes. They did grow the government to official "bloated" status. Nobody can take the high ground on this issue.

But does that means we need more taxes? No, it means we need less spending and smaller government.

But it is interesting to see the responses. The people on the right make statements supporting no new taxes (one of the big reasons Bush Sr lost to Clinton - people read his lips). But the left just whines (as usual) about the right always responding, and then gratuitously throws in an anti-Bush rant (about not fixing potholes?), rather than telling us what they really want, which is to tax the #$^&#~*\@ out of us and spend it on social engineering. Trust me, they don't want to fix the roads, they want the money first, then they will decide what "we" need and they ride to the rescue and be the benificent providers of all our needs, congratulating themselves for saving us once again.

Save me from those that want to save me! "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy